When we're quality sex
educators; when we are or aim to be inclusive, forward-thinking and do
sex education in ways that can or do serve diverse populations, we will
tend to define sex very broadly,
far more so than people who don't work in sex education often tend to,
even if and when their experiences with sex and sexuality have been
broad. Often, the longer we work as sexuality educators, and the longer
we also just live and experience our own sexual lives, the more
expansive the definition becomes. If we live and/or work on the margins,
like if we or people we serve are queer, gender-variant, culturally diverse, have disabilities, the
diversity in our definitions of what sex can be will become even
greater. I'd say that for me, at this point, I'd love to be able to
define sex by simply saying "Sex could earnestly be absolutely anything
for a given person." While I think that's ultimately the most accurate
way to define it, something like that is also not going to be very
useful for people a lot of the time.
Human sexuality is incredibly diverse, so much more so than
any one person's sex life as they experience it usually is. We can't
miss that when we work as sex educators for a long time because we see
and hear about so many people's varied sex lives and sexualities.
So, if we want to be as accurate as we can when we talk about sex, a
wide, flexible definition is important, especially if and when we are
only using that word. It's important to be inclusive and express the
real diversity of human sexuality, and also to help people have a
sexuality and a sex life that is not only authentic and unique, but
which doesn't limit them or feel limiting because they're only seeing it
or hearing about it within the bounds of a box far smaller than truly
fits all sex and sexuality can be, or which is the wrong size or shape
for them as people, for their sex life and sexuality.
Of course, sex educators won't often tend to use the word sex, all by
itself, very often the way that people often tend to do in daily life.
We usually are and have to be much more specific with our language. When
any of us are talking about specific kinds of sex, we will tend to make
that clear: we may talk about genital sex
versus non-genital, for instance. We'll use specific terms for certain
kinds of sex so that, for example, when we're talking about penis-in-vagina intercourse,
we'll say that, not "sex." People we counsel or talk with will often
use "sex" as shorthand, and when they do, we usually have to ask them a
lot of questions to find out what they're talking about. If they're
asking about what kind of sexual healthcare they may need or what their
health risks may have been, for instance, then knowing things like what
KIND of sex they're talking about, what body parts and functions they
have, what body parts and functions any partners may have is all vital
information to answer questions correctly. If they're asking how to
"have sex," we have to ask a lot of questions in order to answer that
question with anything more than a glib, "However you want."
Often people we're providing education for want to talk about what
"sex" is, and sometimes our broad definitions are problematic with their
current conceptualizations of sex, their sexual ideals, religious
beliefs, relationship
borders or boundaries or in other areas. Obviously, some of those
issues are not about a broad definition of sex being a problem, or even
that person's personal views, but about a limited social or cultural
definition or view being problematic. In other words, that's often about
the world as a whole needing to keep changing and expanding how it
views and presents sex and sexuality. But that doesn't mean we can just
figure the world will catch up to us, because the people we educate live
in and are influenced by that world. We need to work to try and strike a
balance as best we can where we're accurate but where our language and
terms also work well for people and the world they live in.
The fact of the matter is that it is sometimes, if not often, easier
for those of us who are sex educators to use the term "sex" broadly in
work than it is for people to use the term "sex" broadly in life. Most
of us are already put on the margins just by virtue of our jobs, because
a whole lot of people consider our jobs sexual deviance -- or the
people who would do this job, sexual deviants -- already. We also often
have more people in our lives, at work and outside work, who assume
broad definitions of sex than people who don't work in sexuality. We
usually are, as my friend Cory so often likes to say, non-representative
of the general population.
I'm probably going to be stating the obvious, but one of the biggest
issues with broad definitions of sex for many people is that socially,
interpersonally, and in a lot of places, culturally, who has "had sex"
and who has not "had sex" matters. Often, it matters a whole lot and can
be seriously loaded. How it matters varies, but for example, someone
who says they "had sex" and means that they engaged in clothed frottage (dry humping) or masturbation, and has someone else interpret that as them having had anal intercourse,
can wind up with consequences like being accused of lying, being
accused of cheating, being made to worry about health risks they likely
didn't even have, or having gossip spread about their sexual status to
many people that isn't true and can result in social stigmas or even, in
some areas or situations, in violence.
By all means, I'm always going to be a fan of using more specific
terms, and using more specific terms would be helpful for everyone to do
so I always want to encourage people to do that and help by using
specific terms as often as possible so they can have them to use for
themselves. Understanding how broad sex is can help people understand
why being more specific is often so important. For instance, if someone
makes an agreement with a partner about not "having sex with" other
people, they're going to want to talk specifics lest one or both of them
wind up breaking agreements they didn't even realize they made, and
causing strife in their lives and relationships they likely could have
avoided. Does "having sex" that mean only genital sex? Only physical
sex: what about cybersex or phone sex? Only sex with someone of a given gender? Does that include masturbation or pornography use? Defining what sex is and is not is also major when it comes to defining the difference between sex and sexual abuse. Defining all of what sex and healthy sexuality can be
well also plays a big part in acceptance and tolerance for people whose
sexuality or consensual sex life is or has been marginalized, viewed or
treated as hypersexual, dysfunctional or "frigid," "perverse" or
"deviant," categorizations which are often radically inaccurate with
what we know about the diversity of sex, or based in bigotry or bias.
Defining sex and sexuality well is vital not just to sexual
inclusion, tolerance and visibility but to inclusion, tolerance and
visibility -- and compassion -- in general.
But in plenty of situations in life and especially with sexuality,
people will use shorthand -- especially when it comes to privacy --
something we have to make and leave room for.
We've heard sometimes from readers and users who have been frustrated
with the fact that our broad definition doesn't always work with their
own specific one. Now, often, this is about having limited sexual or
even general life experience and conceptualization, or limited exposure
to all of what sex can be for people, something that will often change
with time and more experience and exposure, but, we also want to always
be refining what we do to explore ways that we can define sex and use
that word in a way that is as inclusive as possible but which is also as
useful as possible for diverse people.
I think it's entirely possible there is middle ground between the way
educators like us define sex very broadly and the way some folks do so
in a more limited way that we aren't seeing or haven't yet thought of
yet, despite that fact that we tend to talk about this as educators all
the time, and talk or think about this in some ways every day in what we
do with the people we serve. Sometimes, a very targeted conversation
can do things more general thinking or talking mostly with colleagues
cannot, so I'm asking all of you to take part in that with us here.
I don't have the answers, nor would I suggest I know what the
absolute "right" ones are. What I have is constant questioning, and I'd
love to hear what you think about this and just read and listen to what
you have to say to help advance and further inform my own thinking about
it.
I'd love to hear about the ways you think defining sex broadly is
helpful, but also the ways you think it can or may be problematic. I'd
love to hear about your ideas of ways to bridge some of these gaps, and
define sex in ways that are accurate, diverse and inclusive, but which
also take into account the fact that most people live in a world where
who has "had sex" and hasn't matters, and where it can be easier or more
comfortable to just say "sex" in some situations. All of this is often
especially weighty for groups like young people, people abstaining from
certain kinds of sex, people in sexually exclusive
relationships and agreements and people who are in cultures or members
of cultural groups where having "had sex" in certain situations can
carry serious social consequences. I'd love to hear from our teen and
young adult readers, but also from our older adult allies.
Per usual, I just ask that everyone be mindful about making
statements that may or do define other people, their sexualities or
their sex lives, or make judgments about others. For instance saying "Sex is only intercourse, of course!"
is not only not helpful, and not true for many people, it can also make
folks who feel differently feel locked out of the conversation or made
invisible. Saying "I have only defined sex as intercourse because..."
is a lot more useful and also leaves room for people who have different
experiences, conceptualizations and definitions. Talking about how
someone else's definition doesn't work for you is okay, but please do so
in a way that's respectful and kind and that can further conversation,
rather than stopping it.
Because most of the discussions we have at Scarleteen happen on our
message boards, rather than on the blog, there's a copy of this piece,
and likely some discussion on it soon, posted there, if you have a preference in where you like to talk.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
0 comments:
Post a Comment